Holds

[SK8R43]

I dont like the idea at all, the whole reason why i DONT play SM is because of holds and mines. If you add them here then its just becoming too much like SM. If you want holds and mines then just go play stepmania lol
Honestly speaking if they ever get added i quit. :/


EDIT: Or do what Ben said.....

[Wayward Vagabond]

nope

[Xx{Midnight}xX]

Holds are bad and encourage more stupidity than FFR charts already encourage

[yo man im awesome]

Originally Posted by Xx{Midnight}xX

Middie is mad and encourages mindless babbling about "bad" charts on FFR

oops

[Xx{Midnight}xX]

Originally Posted by yo man im awesome

oops

You changed a quote to make a joke that honestly isn't even remotely true because your opinion of me is blind as shit.

[TC_Halogen]

*sigh*

anyway -- I'm against holds because the lack of holds + added judgment for mistakenly hit taps make FFR what it is. Besides, with boos being in the picture, the mechanics of creating freeze arrows don't seem very sensible. In addition to this, from a judgment perspective, quality of charts could potentially reduce itself due to people using holds improperly/insensibly.

[noname219]

I don't think the problem relies on the fact FFR needs to be different from Stepmania or ThirdStyle. I think the game has already proved its significance to a point where it no longer needs to be completely different from all rhythm games. In fact, we should question ourselves abouth what exactly holds can bring to the gameplay, not to the community.

I do believe holds can add something to the game but I don't think its inclusion is possible at the moment. The amount of work related to this kind of feature is far too much high.

Edit: not saying FFR should be similar to Stepmania, variation is indeed better, but I don't think we should base our argumentation solely on this point.

@ SK8R3 : if you don't like holds and mines on SM you can disabled them in the menu settings