|
View Poll Results: Should Crowdpleaser be Removed from Public Level Ranks? | |||
Yes | 67 | 56.30% | |
No | 46 | 38.66% | |
Undecided | 6 | 5.04% | |
Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-13-2014, 08:36 PM | #141 |
Я тебя люблю Маша
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
Okay, lets be serious, the trill IS hard. The file is complete garbage. And even if you vibrate it legitimately, as Dossar shows in his iso video, you wont get the FC half the time due to FFR game play problems. I've passed shit like OME and I've only legitimately fced the stupid trill like 5 times. There is no possible way that 199 people legitimately fced the file. I can't find one reason, other than the fact that it is an old file [which frankly, is a crappy reason] that this should be included in public level ranks.
|
02-13-2014, 09:20 PM | #142 |
ごめんなさい (/ω\)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Age: 28
Posts: 2,290
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
46-35-5
pretty sure majority rules. |
02-15-2014, 02:14 AM | #143 |
The Dominator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Bay, ON
Age: 35
Posts: 8,987
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
Whether or not CP is a technically accurate file makes no difference, it shouldn't be moved for this reason. It shouldn't even be a factor for it being moved imo.
Criteria for token files, especially in recent years, are based on if the file is a v2, parody/novelty file, or out of the ordinary for example; after all, these are unlockables. Crowdpleaser is anomalous in the public ranks due to the fact that it involves techniques that are completely specific to that file in order to manipulate it. For this reason alone, it should be moved to token ranks. Likewise, I can guarantee you that subsequent charts that demand vibration similar to CP will never be added to public ranks for the above reasons. Unfortunately even when a better method for scoring is implemented, the overlay issue will persist on the upper end of the leaderboard so although the problem won't be as pronounced, it will still be an anomaly in the ranks much like vRofl, p4u v1, or TWWW. Majority wants it moved and rightly so, so let's get it over with. Last edited by Dynam0; 02-15-2014 at 02:16 AM.. |
04-8-2014, 11:57 AM | #144 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 585
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
Bump, move this file already...
|
04-8-2014, 12:51 PM | #145 |
Fractals!
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
I have no problem with CP remaining in the public ranks. So what if it's unique? So what if it's a joke? It's a file like any other, there's no gimmicks involved in the level itself (no video background, no moving targets, no mod scripts), and we have a CPv2 in the skill token ranks already, requiring merely a pass of v1 to unlock. It's just straightforward vibrajacking in that one part.
|
04-8-2014, 12:53 PM | #146 |
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,205
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
|
04-8-2014, 01:03 PM | #147 |
good hot
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North Carolina
Age: 29
Posts: 5,309
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
lol
__________________
|
04-8-2014, 01:07 PM | #148 |
FFR Simfile Author
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,195
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
mm
__________________
|
04-8-2014, 02:17 PM | #149 |
D6 Challeneged
Join Date: Aug 2012
Age: 31
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
y'all d7 scrubs just gotta go faster!
|
04-8-2014, 03:01 PM | #150 |
Signature Extraordinare~~
Song Submission & Events Manager
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
This debate has been going on since 2011 lol
also ~50 FCs are legitimate FCs, the other FCs are people holding keys to FC or using double inputs. Like me, I held the keys to FC it. |
04-8-2014, 03:22 PM | #151 |
Anime Avatars ( ◜◡^)っ✂╰⋃╯
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Squat Rack
Age: 34
Posts: 10,837
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
I can move both this and Revo to token ranks and would have done so long ago, but an admin needs to recode the token requirements so the V2s will unlock the V1s.
I can move CP to Legacy for the time being, but that seems pointless if ultimately that's not where we want it to end up. Last edited by One Winged Angel; 04-8-2014 at 03:25 PM.. |
04-8-2014, 03:26 PM | #152 |
Fractals!
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
I'm not really a fan of skill tokens with regular token requirements. Perhaps you intend to switch the V2s with the V1s?
|
04-8-2014, 03:29 PM | #153 |
Anime Avatars ( ◜◡^)っ✂╰⋃╯
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Squat Rack
Age: 34
Posts: 10,837
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
^^
|
04-8-2014, 06:28 PM | #154 |
Anime Avatars ( ◜◡^)っ✂╰⋃╯
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Squat Rack
Age: 34
Posts: 10,837
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
it's done, everyone thank arc
|
04-8-2014, 06:34 PM | #155 |
soleil ardent
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New York
Age: 27
Posts: 6,514
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
The deed is done
__________________
|
04-8-2014, 07:41 PM | #156 |
new hand moves = dab
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: he/they
Age: 33
Posts: 10,095
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
YOU GUYS ARE THE BEST. well maybe not the best but really really close. seriously though
|
04-8-2014, 07:47 PM | #157 |
D7 Elite Keymasher
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,337
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
gr8 job m8 i r8 it 8/8
|
04-8-2014, 07:58 PM | #158 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 585
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
Looks like stuff actually got done, nice!
|
04-8-2014, 08:06 PM | #159 |
Forever
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,664
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
rip cp
__________________
Violets Forever |
04-8-2014, 08:45 PM | #160 |
D6 Challeneged
Join Date: Aug 2012
Age: 31
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: On the Removal of Crowdpleaser from Level Ranks
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|